Ad Hominem does not make it a PWN video

Well, if you were looking for an actual rebuttal to Blunty3000's (TRWN didn't have the balls to say his name) argument, it's not here. It's just full of pictures of Blunty with a pacifier, annoying sound effects, and useless metaphors. I'm not sure he realized that Blunty3000 is a comedian. He showed clips of him doing stupid things, thinking that he was trying to be a serious news source. 

BTW, none of them had anything to do with the video that he was "refuting". Facts that he "has many videos with misleading thumbnails" and "probably doesn't remember what it was like to be a small channel on YouTube" are not on topic at all. Only seconds of this 7-minute video were about his video on the subject.

Oh, and TRWN recently became a YT Partner. So I guess all that stuff about YouTube freezing his view counter and such were lies... Hmmmm...

Prank on Fred?

Well, the newest wave of stupidity/spam has hit the comments. No it's not another "YouTube blackout", it's a so-called  "prank" on Fred. People have decided that if you don't want to watch a video, you should not avoid clicking on it and watching, but you should instead make it so that nobody else can. 

First of all, what makes you think that people subscibed to Fred will unsubscribe in an attempt to destroy him? Odds are, they enjoy his videos and would like to see more of them. If you subscibed to him and don't enjoy his videos, your unsubscription does nothing but filter out idiots from his sub list. 

I doubt 183 losers unsubscibing to Fred will "make the news and cause controversy". It obviously wouldn't destroy him either.